Friday, January 22, 2021

CNBC clueless Unemployment cheerleaders are lying again as they know better

 


How is this perceived as bullish (or data to be ignored) at this stage in the Covid-19 process as ~900,000 Americans filed for first-time “initial” unemployment benefits last week...Initial unemployment claims were expected to remain depressingly high last week, after spiking the week before, and they did (though they came in a smidgeon better than expected) as the numbers came in  (less than the 935,000 that the street expected and slightly lower than the 926,000 revised level the week before), but still in  the extreme zone...the good news is that the continuing Covid-19 pandemic claims have fallen notably since the spring However the overall number of Americans on unemployment benefits fell last week (as many were taken off the rolls due to exhausting benefits) but it still remains well above 15 million...This “BS” so-called silver lining should have a huge asterisk against it as it was dominated by a massive drop in California claims which fundamentally makes zero sense as the state's lockdown policies only became more prevalent during this period...

A massive stock market bubble is forming, may have already been completely inflated

 


In my opinion the extremely long in the tooth, 12+/- year long bull market since 2009 has finally matured into a fully-fledged massive bubble due to massive intervention and manipulation and almost endless liquidity. Featuring extreme overvaluation, explosive price increases (many times in zombie firms) frenzied issuance (especially the issuance / of stock at nose-bleed price levels, and nutty IPO’s) and hysterically speculative investor behavior, I believe this period / cycle will be recorded as one of the great bubbles in financial history, right along with the South Sea bubble, the bubble prior to the Great Depression of 1929, and the Dot-com bubble of 2000.  Massive Hindenburg type bubbles are when fortunes are made (playing the proverbial “dark-side” sell/short-side) and lost (due to stubbornness of not taking profits) where old savvy investors truly prove their determination, courage, and knowledge [ "buy when you feel like the world is coming to an end...and sell when you believe there is no stopping the bull-train and extreme euphoria has gripped thew markets]! We need to position our positioning a portfolio to avoid the worst of pain that becomes inflicted by a massive bubble bursting is the hard part.

This massive liquidity fueled speculative bubble (FED and fiscal, and massive debt-laden) will burst in due time, no matter how hard the FED and others try to support it, and it will have significantly damaging effects on the economy and on many-many portfolios. For the majority of the FOMO crowd and the incessant dip-buying Pavlovian response that has been so conditioned these past several years. Speaking from close to 30+ years of experience the one reality that you can never change is that a significantly pumped up higher-priced asset will produce a lower return than a lower-priced asset. Most of the time, major asset classes like stocks, bonds, commodities etc. are reasonably priced relative to one another.

The correct response is to make modest bets on those assets that measure as being cheaper and hope that the measurements are correct. With reasonable skill at evaluating assets the valuation-based allocator can expect to survive these phases intact with some small outperformance. “Small” because the opportunities themselves are small. If you wanted to be unfriendly you could say that asset allocation in this phase is unlikely to be especially important. It would certainly help in these periods if the manager could also add value in the implementation, from the effective selection of countries, sectors, industries, and individual securities as well as major asset classes.

This long, slow-churning (due to massive intervention and manipulation) bull market (12+ years) like other long-term giddy bull markets can spend many & many months years above serious fair value and even 2 sometimes 3-years longer than logic can dictate and rally way above fair valuations into nosebleed valuations. These events have often outlasted the patience of most traders/investors. And when price rises are very rapidly as we have seen this past year which typically happens toward the end of a bull market, impatience is followed by nervousness. As I like to say, there is nothing more irritating than watching dumb-ass folks get rich chasing mostly-crap higher and higher many zombie firms that have exhausted 8 of their 9 lives. As we saw in late 1997, when the SPX-500 surpassed its previous 1929 peak of 21x earnings, I stared to get nervous then into late 1999 I stated shouting loud and clear (SELL-SELL-SELL) and for 4-5 more months I watch the market soared up to 36.75x earnings, after being bloodied several times trying to sell/short the giddy market.

During the fall of 2019 (prior to the onset of my massive wave of health issues) I said it was likely that we were in the last innings of this 12+ year long bull-market and the subsequent bubble could implode in December into January, then came the drop into March but it was due to the Covid-19 pandemic and then we saw wave after wave of massive liquidity from the government and FED; and away we went as the dips were bought on a ballistic parabolic ride. One of the most dependable elements of the late stages of the massive mega bubbles created in history has been really crazy investor behavior, especially on the part of individuals. For the first decade of this bull market, which is the longest in history, we had seen for the most part structured buying and the rally lacked waves of wild speculation in 2019 to now we have it in record amounts.

Ø  The infamous Buffett indicator, total stock market capitalization to GDP, broke through its all-time-high 2000 record high a measure of the total value of all publicly-traded stocks in a country, divided by that country's Gross Domestic Product (we are also extremely over-extended significantly of debt).

Ø  Amazingly we saw this past Covid-19 year that there were 480 IPOs (including an incredible 248 SPACs) more new listings than the 406 IPOs we saw come to market in 2000 into the dot.com bubble.

Ø  There are about 175 firms (with market capitalization of over $250 million) that have more than tripled this past year, which is over 3 times as many in any year in the previous 11 to 12 years.

Ø  The volume of small retail purchases, of less than 10 contracts, in call options on U.S. equities has increased 9-fold compared to 2019, and 2019 was already approaching 30% above the long-run average.

I am not at all surprised with close to $5.75 trillion in liquidity (FED and Government) that the market has advanced at a parabolic fast rate and with increasing speculative massive excesses. It is precisely what I have come to expect from a late-stage bubble: an accelerating, nearly vertical stage of unknowable size but these bursts of euphoric buying are typically short lived. I have “the hard way” found that cycle at the top of a bubble is shockingly painful and full of risks for newbie / reckless grizzly bears (who should not short due to inexperience and lack of discipline).

v  Currently, I am short 65% of my portfolio and now I am doubling down, because as prices move further away from their standard deviations and real trends, at accelerating speed and with growing speculative fervor.

The strangest feature of this bull market is how unlike every previous mega bubble is that past bubbles have combined accommodative monetary conditions with decent economic conditions. Today’s extremely wounded economy is totally different: as we have only seen a small-partly recovery so far and in my opinion, we are likely facing a double-dip, the numbers are already foretelling of a slowdown, and if nothing else we are facing an exceedingly high degree of uncertainty (should be very unsettling for the markets). Yet the market has continued to crawl higher than it was last fall when the economy looked to be doing OK and unemployment was at a historic low. Today the P/E ratio of the market is extremely high and within a few percent of the historic top while the economy is in the cesspool. This is completely without precedent and may even be a better measure of speculative intensity than the massive rise of SPACs.

This time, more than in any previous mega FED intervened bubble, investors are relying on massive and I mean massive accommodative monetary conditions and zero real rates extrapolated indefinitely. This is a kin to assuming great/peak economic performance forever: these conditions are being utilized to justify much lower yields on all assets and therefore correspondingly higher equity prices. But neither perfect economic conditions nor perfect financial conditions can last forever, despite the CNBC hype.

From my research, (I have read over 500-articles, books and expert opinions) all mega bubbles end with the near-universal recognition that the current one will not end yet; and the omnipotent FED has their back; because Y-2-K Greenspam’s FED in 2000 was predicting a lasting improvement in productivity and was pledging their unwavering loyalty (what I saw as massive “moral hazard”) to the stock market; Then Bernanke believed unwaveringly that in 2006 that “U.S. house prices merely reflect a strong U.S. economy” as he perpetuated the FE’s wave of moral hazard: Yellen, and now Powell, maintained this Ponzi-scheme premise; as we have seen that all three of Powell’s predecessors claimed that the equity asset prices they helped inflate into Hindenburg proportions aided the economy through the wealth effect (I almost puke when I reflect on this “BS”). But all three of these charlatans have avoided claiming credit for the ensuing market implosions that I repeatedly wrote about would inevitably develop...the dot-com bubble bursting of 2000 and the housing implosion of 2008, each complete with the accompanying anti-wealth effect that came when the economy least needed it, exaggerating the real weakness in the economy.

Now once again the massively over-inflated equity prices this time will hold and gains will continue as CNBC and other so-called gurus want us to believe without question that the FED (due to their symbiotic relationship with the TBTF-bankers, and corporations, and especially the government “as they are far from independent”) keep interest rates near “0%” forever, an ultimate statement of “moral hazard” the asymmetrical market risk we have come to know and depend on. The mantra of recent has been that the FED can engineer low rates with out any ramifications for ever to prevent a decline in equity asset prices. But of course, this FED is your ultimate savior was a fallacy in 1999-2000 and in 2007-2008 as it is a fallacy now. In the end, moral hazard did not stop the technology bubble implosion, with the Nasdog imploding over 80%...nor did in 2008, did it stop U.S. housing market to melt-down a shocking loss of over $8.4 trillion dollars of value in then over-valued homes; and an ensuing cycle of mega weakness in the economy; and a broad decline in global asset prices. All the promises that the masses believed in were in the end worth nothing, except for one; the FED did what it could to pick up the pieces and help the markets get into stride for the next trend into another massive- wave of over-inflated asset prices and then a subsequent ensuing decline. And here we are again, waiting for the music to stop and to see how many chairs have been removed from this game of musical chairs.

I have acknowledged that this giddy market can rise further for a few more weeks or even months like it did on me in 11/1999 into 3/2000 and 9/2007 into 2008. My best guess as to the top of this bubble is the nest 50-100 days coinciding with the Biden Administration broad rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines. At that moment, the most urgent issue facing the global economics could be abated or significantly mitigated. Market participants will likely breathe a sigh of relief, look around, and immediately realize that the real economy is still in the proverbial cesspool just as the FED and fiscal stimulus will be significantly reduced or eliminated with the end of the Cocid-19 crisis in sight, while acknowledging that market valuations are absurd a classic set up of “Buy the rumor, sell the news.”

This market is now displaying all characteristics of a mega bubble. The most impressive features right now are the intensity and enthusiasm of the giddy bulls that have been feasting on mega doses of locoweed! Another feature of a late stage long in the tooth bull markets has been a parabolic rise of the final leg, which in recent cases has been over 60% in the past 18 months a rate well over 2x the normal rate of assent within a bull market. Currently the U.S. indices have risen over 70% for the SPX-500, over 100% for the Russell 2000 in just 9 months.

So, please my friends (and yet to be friends) do not wait for the so-called market gurus (GS, JPM, BAC, MS and Black Rock) to become openly bearish: it never really happens. Their “BS” market premise is simple: always be extremely bullish as it is good for business one main reason why they have always had massive bullish advice especially in mega bubbles.

Wednesday, January 20, 2021

The New-American Dream, one of bailouts and handouts

 


I believe that we as a society and a once-great nation wherein people worked hard and with honor and integrity reached out to capture the American-Dream crossed an extremely dangerous line that should have never been crossed when as a nation sent out so-called “stimulus payments” directly to most Americans during the incredibly early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic (a huge swath of Americans that were not even negatively impacted).  I have been a staunch democrat all my life but even I could not even come close to rationalizing such a development as what was happening was pure “unneeded” socialism, but the politicians defended the “unneeded” inflated payments by insisting that we were in the middle of a major national emergency (then why did so many folks who did not need assistance get a windfall?).  I warned then that once the government started issuing ass-kissing checks, the American people would always keep demanding more and more hand-outs especially from the new generations that are allergic to hard work!  When it was announced that the latest round of “stimulus payments” would only be $600 per person, some Americans seems angry it was not $2,000 or even $3,000 angry...I on the other hand was astonished at how many Americans would be receiving said handouts who did not in my opinion need or deserve one (I am not usually a tight-fisted scrooge when it comes to the working class. In just days Democrats will shortly have control of the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives, and one of the first things they plan to do is to deliver more ass-kissing bailout money (another $1,400) on top of the already approved $600.00) to the American people (again to many who have jobs, never lost any income etc. and to many folks who are gaming the system “not even looking for work”). Unfortunately, Americans have tasted free ad easy taxpayer money and they want more and more!

Ø  Remember the chief ass-kissers one being the incoming Vice-President, Harris, previously proposed giving out monthly $2,000 checks for the duration of this pandemic; astounding stupidity nevertheless it was close to passage and it would be a recurring monthly $2,000 check mirroring the payments proposed in the “Monthly Economic Crisis Support Act” that she introduced in the Senate in May 2020. So, if you are married with two kids, you would have gotten $8,000 every month under the plan. Most Americans would have been very eager to sign up for would they not! Sure, beats working right. Where would the money come to pay for the approximately $600 billion every month, hell no one would care as it would mean that it would add more than $7 trillion dollars to our national debt over the course of an entire year...very doable right .

The great thinker (and a fellow Brother Mason) Benjamin Franklin once made the following statement. “When the people find that they can vote themselves money that will herald the end of the republic.” Sadly, I believe we have now reached such a massive life altering republic altering tipping point. And this comes at a time when millions of Americans are in desperate need because the real economy continues to implode all around us due to failed economic policies. As the U.S. economy continues to come apart at the seams, finding sources of tax revenue will become almost impossible. Perhaps corporations who have not paid any taxes in many years will step up and offer to pay their fair share, and maybe the elite and most wealthy will follow suit.

Will the dollar base here of plunge into the cesspool?

 The Uncle Joe Biden administration has yet to take office, but it already has a significant major crisis on its hands; that of a deteriorating U.S. dollar due mostly to massive cyber-FED-money printing and massive new fiscal deficit debt! The greenback has declined over 13% since March 2020. That is a significant decline on its own, and it has provided some great profit tailwinds for multi-national firms (most Dow components and SPX-100 firms). However, what is particularly concerning is the fact that the U.S. dollar continues to without to date staging a short-covering reversal rally.  Put another way, this decline is occurring with little if any short-term trend-breaks.



We are currently seeing a potential dead cat bounce off of near-term critical support however, once we take out the old lows of 88.25 the dollar has no real support until 83.10 thereafter 79.00 that would be serious trouble.

Ø  The ONLY time in history that the U.S. dollar plunged to such levels was when a major Black Swan event was taking place or about to take place in the global financial system. Bear in mind, this is a major contagion before Uncle Biden administration implements their 1st round of “bailouts” approximately cost $1.9 trillion a so-called stimulus program along with another $2 trillion infrastructure program and this is the makings of an inflationary shit-storm.

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

NFLX sure knows how to spark a short squeeze with well crafted "BS" !

 CRAZY-SHIT valuations and fuzzy math crap! 

After hours on 01-19-2021; we saw an earnings report from Netflix was a mixed bag: despite mediocre and lackluster earnings and revenues at best, the firm has been riding a wave of extreme optimism, its stock soaring in early 2020, putting it in the top 20 for SPX-500 firms, similar to the gains seen by other shutdown beneficiaries. Still, after surging to a record high in early July, the stock has traded in a waffling range-bound pattern (from $460 to $545), unable to break out to a new high. And while there is no doubt that viewership has surged during the nasty Covid-19 lockdowns in the U.S. and much of the world, there are serious complications that the cheerleaders on CNBC have ignored almost completely as the Covid-19 virus brought TV and film production to a halt, a situation that may only get worse for Netflix as the months wear on. But the biggest $64,000 question remains how many future subs has Covid-19 sucked into the present day with significant enticements?


So, was 2020/Q4 the quarter that would finally unleash another nosebleed repricing higher for Netflix stock, or has the triple top telegraphed some serious pain?  Well, the bulls may have finally lucked out, despite a bit of a heart attack initially, because after Bloomberg first reported a miss in EPS sending the stock sharply lower first, it then reported a huge beat in 2020/Q4 subs (many on a free trial) here are the details:

Ø  Netflix 2020/Q4 pro forma EPS $1.19 “missed big” vs. estimates of $1.38!

Ø  Netflix 2020/Q4 Revenue. $6.64 billion, vs. estimates of $6.63 billion a tiny beat!

This was the data that hit first and sent the stock lower (as I went SHORT...then I became trapped in a SHORT losing $4.75 in a blink of an eye) as the headlines were quickly followed by what I saw as a very stupid catalyst behind the sharp reversal higher, namely a 2.5 million beat in 2020Q4 paying subs; how could this be; likely due to the Covid-19 home-bound...Netflix 2020/Q4 streaming paid net change 8.51 million vs. estimates for 6.06 million...but these numbers were still weak when compared to 219/Q4, 2020/Q1, 2020Q2


They stated, “We’re becoming an increasingly global service” with 83% of paid net subscriber additions in 2020 coming from outside the U.S. and Canada". The number of new subs was enough to allow lame investors to quickly ignore the disappointing 2021/Q1 outlook of just 6.0 million subs (again significantly below the just-released 8.51 million sub number) and worse yet well below the expected 7.45-million **another WTF are the chasers of price thinking**  Interestingly Netflix Sees fiscal year 2021operating margin of 20%...they now see operating margin at a mere 14.4% vs. 20.4% quarter/quarter! Operating income is expected to come in at $954.2 million, a drop of 27% quarter/quarter...and negative free cash flow $284 million vs. positive $1.15 billion quarter / quarter...By adding 8.5 million subs, Netflix has crossed the 200 million paid memberships mark (or have they). But while the Firms subscriber outlook was disappointing it was more than offset by a surprising addition to their the released statement “combined with our $8.2 billion cash balance and our $750m undrawn credit facility, we believe we no longer have a need to raise external financing for our day-to-day operations.” This was seen as a huge milestone for a firm which until a year ago had not had a cash flow positive quarter since 2014 (although it once again begs the question how much of this is based on optimistic assumptions about continued growth). The cash flow positive “BS” forecast came at a good time: just as the firm announced that net cash generated by operating activities in 2020/Q4 was -$138 million vs. -$1.5 billion in the prior-year period, while free cash flow (FCF) for the quarter dropped to -$284 million vs. -$1.7 billion.

 This made me choke and I wanted to puke: Netflix stated that as it generates excess cash (a joke), it intends to maintain $10 billion to 15 billion in gross debt and will explore returning cash to shareholders through ongoing stock buybacks, as they did in (2007-2011).  Netflix also tried to appease investor concerns that the pandemic will slow their productions. From the investor letter: “Our productions are back up and running in most regions - we have learned that flexibility and adaptability are paramount in this fast-changing environment. With over 500 titles currently in post-production or preparing to launch on our service and plans to release at least one new original film every week in 2021 with extraordinary talent, we’re confident we’ll continue to have a great content offering for our members.” 

Between the subscriber beat and the firm's forecast that it will soon be cash flow positive going forward, NFLX stock has exploded higher (and I got trapped for a tad) and at last check was about 10% higher trading just above $565.00 to $570.00.

Monday, January 18, 2021

The Great Ponzi Scheme inflicted on Americans

Telling Americans that there is NO inflation (or just contained/constrained inflation) is a great Ponzi scheme used to screw the masses (working-class and poor).

If you really look at stuff and other of life’s tangible products, and you like me feel that they are far more expensive than they were 11+/- years ago, “they are” as it is likely because everything in reality is more expensive than it was then (called inflation, but do not tell the masses who have been like Pavlov’s conditioned to believe that inflation does not exist). Let us take a look at real estate, it costs more than ever to buy a home than ever before despite historic low interest rates. In 1940, the median home value in the U.S. was $2,938, 40-years later in 1980, it had risen to $47,200, and in just another 20-years later in 2000, it had risen to $119,600; when we do the math and adjust for the government’s “BS” bogus inflation numbers, the median home price in 1940 would have increased to $30,600 in 2000 dollars, not $89,000 higher!

Ø  One reason why the typical homebuyer is now running into the age range of 44+/- years old (many are still living with mom & dad) whereas in 1981, the typical homebuyer fell into the age range of 25-34.  Ans it is also significant harder to rent; in the past 5-years alone, the annual rise in rental prices was nearly 4x the overall inflation rate.

During the past 20-years....NO housing inflation right 😊

  • Median Home Price (NSA) in 12/01/2000 = $139,815
  • Median Home Price (NSA) in 12/01/2005 = $210.371
  • Median Home Price (NSA) in 12/01/2010 = $175,569 (a drop after the great housing bubble burst)
  • Median Home Price (NSA) in 12/01/2015 = $215,206
  • Median Home Price (NSA) in 06/01/2020 = $278,621
  • And the most recent FED data for 2020/Q3 the price for median home sales came in at $324,900  

Now let us look at another over-looked segment called education is also is significantly more expensive for average Americans than ever before. The total 2020-2021 cost of attending Harvard was $49,653 for tuition and $72,391 for tuition, room, board, and fees combined...Before 1960, it cost less than $1,000 to attend the university. Since 1980, the cost of tuition has steadily been on the rise, costing $13,085 in 1990, $22,054 in 2000, and $33,696 in 2010. That makes the cost today almost 18x as much as in did in 197 a markup of more than 1,590%. The rising cost of higher education has led many Americans to owe a collective $1.4 trillion in student loan debt.

Back just 8+ years ago in 2012, 71% of graduates from four-year colleges carried debt, with students at public schools owing an average of $25,550 and those with degrees from private colleges owing an average of $32,300 according to the research done at Student Loan Hero reports.

And as the U.S. supposedly recovered from the stupid-ass TBTF-Banker-led Great Recession, the cost of consumer life sustaining and needed goods has steadily risen as depicted by significant price jumps in items like apparel, shoes, food, education, property taxes, healthcare and health/dental insurance and gasoline for starters. While some prices have risen more drastically than others (and some have even decreased those associated with some electronics etc.) one thing is clear: The cost of everyday life in 2020 is drastically higher than it was in the 1970s or 1980s and 1990s despite the rhetoric and hype on the financial networks and from the FED stating that inflation is significantly contained and constrained!

As Helaine Olen wrote in her book “Pound Foolish,” families in the 2000s put 79% of their discretionary income toward their housing, health care and education, as compared to 50% families used to put toward those same big-ticket items in the 1970s.  Now of course even I can see that wages have risen as well: For example, the Federal minimum wage in 1945 was a paltry $0.40 per hour. (when I stated working it has risen to $1.75...we saw that in 1980, it had risen to $3.10. And in 2009, it rose to a staggering $7.25 (grin), though several states have since mandated higher minimums. But these increases have not been even come close to offsetting the cost of living / real life inflation. These days, a family  can NOT live within any state working 40 hours a week for minimum wage as still it does not enable a person to rent a low cost two-bedroom apartment, let alone begin building any real wealth for the future; this is a crying shame as from my extensive research over the years we have seen a one-wage income earner household become extinct and replaced by a two- wage earner household, and far too often to make ends meet we see the family unit needing 2½ jobs to make ends meet!

The 40-hour work week is now merely an illusion, a myth for far too many Americans (like the American dream has become) a legend from years past. In many modern workplaces, you are more likely to see a Leprechaun at work than an employee who punches in at 9:00am and out at 5:00pm. This does not mean that today’s workers work less than 40 hours, and in many cases the opposite is true. Many knowledge workers start working the minute they roll out of bed. They check emails at their breakfast table or hop on early conference calls with dispersed team-members and overseas customers.  By the time they roll into the office, many have already worked 2 or 4 hours. This so-called  “BS” hyped work freedom is not always a good thing. As the absence of boundaries between work and life can have long-term detrimental negative effects on actual employee productivity and overall performance.

Over 80+/- years ago, it was normal for people to work an average of 70+ hours each week; at one-point a few generations ago employees (including children, yes children as my grandmother were forced to work in a textile mill at age 12) were required to work 14-hour days. All of that changed in 1926 when Henry Ford standardized the 40 hour work week. [The Ford Motor Company then advanced the premise in 1914, when it scaled back from a 48-hour to a 40-hour workweek after Henry Ford believed that too many hours were bad for worker’s productivity. The formation of trade unions also helped to strengthen the idea of working five days a week as was healthier than 6-7] His classic independent research showed that folks working more yielded only a small fractional increase in productivity, and before long productivity actual declined. Finally, in 1938, the 40-hour work week became law via the Fair Labor Standards Act. But do not get your hopes up for a reduced workweek just yet, this law only applies to hourly employees and it referenced getting paid for over time!

The story of run-away inflation in the US this New-Year “2021” could very well amount to the need for a renewed hyped rhetoric calling it a complete mirage and a figment of our imagination! Most Americans are likely to see significant prices jump across a wide variety of sectors this year, thanks in part to massive and I mean massive Fed and governmental stimulus (close to $5 trillion and counting and Covid-19 vaccines that will potentially turbocharge, overall new demand for such post pandemic victims of shut-downs etc. like travel, entertainment, bars, sporting events and other social gatherings. Now due to the weak dollar we have seen prices also rising for many (housing and construction) inputs such as copper, cement and lumber, inflation could very well surpass the FEDs bogus 2.0% target in a mere 2-3 months. Currently through bond activity financial markets are increasingly pricing in higher inflation and debates over whether the central bankers should start easing back on their record monetary stimulus may step up and intensify.

But one critical ingredient will likely be missing according to the inflation hypsters to sustain higher inflation: a tight labor market is needed; unemployment is expected to remain significantly elevated throughout the year, and a resurgence in demand for services could be offset by some goods. Far too many so-called economists think inflation is going to be quite muted likely because unemployment will still be high, and there will still be significant slack in the labor market, which could keep some pressure on wages (nevertheless if prices rise and wages do not this is a terrible economic mix). This year will be a year plagued by numerous inflation-worries. I am betting more and more, that inflation will not stay so stealthy muted. Services make up about 60% of the overall consumer price index and 75% of the core measure, which excludes food and energy.

In a Bloomberg Opinion piece, former New York Fed President Bill Dudley wrote that a rebound in spending on services suggests “sharp price increases might even be needed to balance demand with the available supply, which the pandemic has undoubtedly diminished.” Read the article: Five Reasons to Worry About Faster U.S. Inflation. Those who see few signs of excess inflation “could be setting themselves up for an unpleasant surprise,” Dudley said. One issue in the pipeline: so-called base effects will lead to higher inflation. Price indexes early this year will be compared with the sharp retreats experienced in March and April, which may push inflation above, the FED’s 2.0% bogus premise/goal. Many gauges of input prices and costs paid by firms has also been rising as of late, though factories still have plenty of slack in capacity.

Lame-central bankers adopted a new policy framework in August and signaled a significant willingness to allow PCE inflation to exceed their target for quite some time. In 2019 we had a really perfect storm for higher inflation, with low unemployment, goods tariffs, and a weaker dollar from prior years. And that really only got us not even back to the FED’s core inflation objective, so achieving above-target inflation is a really difficult thing for the FED as they make up the data to suit their needs. This past December at 6.7% in November, the jobless rate is almost twice as high as it was in the closing months of 2019, when it stood at a five-decade low of 3.5%...yest the SOB corporations have significantly depressed worker compensation costs as they were again decelerating.

I am betting that another sector that may experience higher inflation is medical care, as providers and beaten-up hospitals try to recoup some of the massive revenue lost during the pandemic. Another factor is that inflation expectations remain well within their historic range due to suppressed data.

An often-overlooked area of massive inflation: This chart blow explores recently released National Health Expenditure (NHE) data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. These data offer insight into changes in health spending over time as well as the driving forces behind spending growth. Health services spending growth fell in early 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic and (costs that were frozen in place)! 


The Quarterly Services Survey (QSS) is one way to look at national health spending, though it does not include data on prescription drugs, medical equipment, and other health-related spending categories that are not considered services. The pandemic led to a historic decrease in health services spending due to social incessant social distancing and the delay or cancellation of other medical procedures. In the 2nd quarter of 2020, health services spending fell by -8.6% over the 2nd quarter of 2019. While health services spending increased in the third quarter of 2020 (1.3%) over the same time in 2019, year-to-date health services spending through the third quarter of 2020 was down by -2.4% (relative to the first three quarters of 2019). Before the pandemic, total health expenditures increased substantially over the past several decades....and this is a huge economic weight for the poor, working class and vanishing middle-class!


Health care spending totaled what we thought was a significant high number of $74.1 billion in 1970. By 2000, health expenditures reached over $1.44 trillion, and in 2019 the amount spent on health more than doubled that to over $3.8 trillion. Total health expenditures represent the amount spent on health care and related activities (such as administration of insurance, health research, and public health), including expenditures from both public and private funds. On a per capita basis, health spending has grown substantially above the rate of pro forma inflation!

On a per capita basis, health care spending has increased over 31x in the past four decades, from $353 per person in 1970 to $11,582 per person in 2019. In constant 2019 dollars, the increase was about 6x, from $1,848 in 1970 to $11,582 in 2019 but the figures do not lie as health care spending growth has far and I mean far outpaced growth of the U.S. economy.

 

Another way to look at the spending trends is to look at what share of the economy is devoted to health. In 1970, 6.9% of the gross domestic product (GDP) in the U.S. was spent toward total health care spending (both through public and private funds). By 2019, the amount spent on healthcare has increased to a whopping 17.87% of GDP. From 2016 through 2019, the share of GDP attributable to health spending decreased slightly from 17.97% to 17.87%. Although health services spending has decreased in the first three quarters of 2020 relative to the same period in 2019, GDP has decreased significantly more in 2020 over 2019, and therefore health care spending likely represents a larger portion of the economy in 2020 than in prior years. 

Per capita out-of-pocket expenditures have grown since 1970 as well as in dollar terms, overall health care spending out-of-pocket expenditures have grown steadily since 1970, averaging $1,240 per capita in 2019, up from $115 per capita in 1970 (that would be ~$603 in 2019 dollars). Out-of-pocket medical costs do not include the amount individuals contribute toward health insurance premiums a massive economic anchor IMHO.

Ø  Most of the recent health care spending growth is in insurance programs, both private and public. Private insurance expenditures now represent 31.5% of total health care spending (up from 20.4% in 1970), and public insurance (which includes Medicare, Medicaid), it represented 41% of overall health spending in 2019 (up from 22% in 1970).

Ø  Per enrollee spending by private insurance grew by 51.3% from 2008 to 2019 significantly faster than both Medicare and Medicaid spending growth per enrollee (26.2% and 16.4%, respectively). Private insurance pays higher prices for healthcare than Medicare and Medicaid.

Ø  Interestingly In 2018, U.S. health care costs were $3.69 trillion. That makes health care one of the country's largest industries. It equals 17.87% of gross domestic product. In comparison, health care cost $27.2 billion in 1960, just 5% of GDP.  That translates to an annual health care cost of- $11,172 per person in 2018 versus just $147 per person in 1960. Health care costs have risen far-far faster than the median annual income.

 

Some of my weekend thoughts? From the old Wise-Owl (grin)

 Some of my weekend thoughts? 

As 2020 ended, financial markets mainly in the United States have reached new highs, on hopes and prayers that the Covid-19 vaccines would be the cure-all and create the conditions for a rapid V-shaped recovery. And with major central bankers across advanced economies maintaining their massive ultra-low policy rates and unconventional monetary and credit policies, stocks, and bonds have been given a significant tailwind/boost. However, these trends have widened the gap between Wall Street (elite and most-wealthy) and Main Street (working-class, poor, and vanishing middle-class), reflecting a K-shaped recovery in the real economy. Those with stable work environments and incomes who could work from home are doing well; those who are unemployed or partly employed in unstable low-wage jobs are faring quite poorly, and likely the pandemic responses are sowing the seeds for more social unrest in 2021. In the years leading up to the Covid-19 debacle and crisis, 84% of stock-market wealth in the US was held by 10% of shareholders (and 52% by the top 1%), whereas the bottom 50% held barely any stock at all.

The Covid-19 contagion has accelerated this concentration of wealth, because what is bad for the masses is almost always good for elite and most-wealthy. By shedding good salaried jobs and then re-hiring workers on a freelance, part-time, or hourly basis, businesses will likely boost their profits this trend will accelerate over time with the increased application of artificial intelligence and machine learning and other labor-replacing, capital-intensive, skill-biased technologies (just look at a TSLA factory).

Following a free fall in the first half of 2020, the world economies started to undergo a V-shaped recovery in the 3rd quarter, but because many economies were reopened too soon, without real planning and thought. By the 4th quarter, much of Europe and the United Kingdom were heading into a likely W-shaped double-dip recession following the resumption of renewed lockdowns. And even in the US, where there far-far less political appetite for new pandemic restrictions, the expected 7.4% growth in the 3rd quarter is likely to be far too optimistic and will likely be followed by growth of 0.5% to 1.25% at best in the 4th quarter of 2020 and in the 1st quarter of 2021 I am expecting 3.5% to 3.7% growth at best. Risk aversion among American households has translated into reduced reckless spending in an 38% to 72% consumption-based economy and thus less hiring, production, and capital expenditures. And high debts in the corporate sector and across many households imply more deleveraging, which will reduce spending, and more defaults, which will produce a credit crunch as a surge in non-performing loans swamps banks’ balance sheets.

Globally, private, and public debt has risen from 320% of GDP in 2019 to a staggering 369% of GDP at the end of 2020. So far, easy-money policies have prevented a wave of defaults by zombie firms, households, financial institutions, sovereigns, and entire countries, but these massive liquidity measures eventually will lead to higher inflation as a result of demographic aging and negative supply shocks.

Whether major economies actually experience a W or a U-shaped recovery, there will be long lasting economic scars. The reduction in real capital expenditures will significantly reduce potential output for good, and workers who are on the edge will likely experience long bouts of joblessness or underemployment as such they will be less employable in the future. These conditions will then feed into a political backlash, potentially undermining trade, migration, globalization etc. even further. The so called Covid-19 vaccines will not improve these types of misery, even if they can be quickly and equitably administered to the world’s people. But we should not bet on that, given the logistical demands and the rise of “vaccine nationalism” and disinformation-fueled vaccine fears among the public. The “BS” hype that these vaccines are over 90% effective have been based on preliminary, incomplete “BS” contrived data. According to serious non-hyped infection control materials that I have extensively reviewed, we will be lucky if the first generation of Covid-19 vaccines are even 40% to 50% effective, as is the case with the annual flu shots. There is also a risk that in late 2021, Covid-19 cases and deaths will again spike as “vaccinated” folks (who will still be contagious and not truly immune) start engaging in their old risky type behaviors. I find it remarkably interesting that if Pfizer’s vaccine is supposed to be the key to our economic and health salvation, why has their CEO dump millions of dollars of stock on the same day that his firm announced their breakthrough test results...seems very strange to me!

At the halfway point in January, the market has been struggled to hold onto its gains and has failed of late to make new highs. Such is surprising given the recent passage of a $900 billion stimulus bill and Biden’s proposal for another $1.9 trillion. With another $2.8 trillion in stimulus hitting the economy, inducing the FED to do more QE, markets seem for the most part unimpressed...however after the first two weeks of January, the market is up a mere 0.32% year-to-date!

M&A activity was very brisk last year also contributing to the markets bullishness and building on a strong 3rd quarter, announced global deal volumes for the industry (per data from Dealogic) were up 18% quarter/quarter to a staggering $1.3 trillion (with a T) in 2020/Q4, making this the 2nd highest quarterly increase since the TBTF-Banker led great financial crisis. **I do not see this bullish trend repeatable to help fuel a repeatable trend** we saw completed deal volumes were up 44% quarter/quarter to $1.1 trillion. Strength in the near term helped sustained the equity market rebound, FED support.

As I discussed recently there is hardly any pent-up cash sitting ideally on the sidelines, the markets are driven by buyers and sellers supply and demand right now [until the next Tsunami wave of stimulus liquidity is launched] is limited. In the current bull market November – December advance, few were willing to sell, so buyers must keep bidding up prices to attract a seller to make a play. As long as this remains the case, and exuberance exceeds logic, buyers (bag-holders, from the greater fool crowd) will continue to pay higher prices to get into the positions they want, this trend could turn on a dime, so be weary buying tops in this environment.

 ch is also the definition of the proverbial “Greater Fool Theory” which states that it is always possible to make easy money by buying assets/stocks whether or not they are vastly overvalued, as the premise is that you can easily sell them for a profit at a later date because there will always be someone (i.e., a bigger or greater fool) who is willing to pay up more at an over-inflated / higher price. The problem that creeps up slowly and hits like a 10-ton-brick is that when the low level of incremental buyers are no longer willing to pay a higher price, the trend can change dramatically and when sellers realize the change, there will be a rush to sell to a shrinking pool of buyers. Eventually, sellers overwhelm the buyers and then they begin to “panic sell” as buyers evaporate, and prices plunge.

Single stock options open-interest has increased to all-time-high levels, which is why the recent options-X expiration is important for stocks, especially for names with significant large open interest within at-the-money (ATM) January 15th options, because market makers delta-hedge their unusually large options portfolios are likely to be continually active, leaving countless investors suddenly out of the money). This flow is exacerbating stock price moves in an already skittish market.

Small trader call buying mania interestingly has exceeded 9% of total NYSE volume last week (adjusted for equivalent shares). Now it seems that everyone is an options pro, and in my opinion, 95% of option buyers have probably no clue about theta and other Greeks that impact price. On the other hand, do you need that knowledge if you are consistently buying lottery tickets, the returns have been better than buying a Powerball ticket of late!

 he danger the bulls face is that there is abundant evidence that everyone is currently in the shark-infested bloody pool leaving the market vulnerable to significant risk!

·        More stimulus and direct checks start to make their way into the economy which leads to an inflationary spike that causes the FED to discuss hiking rates and tapering QE sooner than even they expected.

·        We have seen a rise in interest rates and if it continues especially over higher inflation concerns until it impacts a massively debt-laden economy causing the FED to be forced to implement what they call “yield curve control.” 

·        Our once prized dollar, which has been on a down-trend (propelling commodities higher) has an enormous net-short position, could reverse hard, and move higher squeezing the shorts, pulling in foreign reserves, causing a short-squeeze on the greenback. The reality is that both a rise in the dollar, with higher yields, is likely to start attracting reserves from countries faced with more serious economic weakness and negative-yielding debt. This would quickly reverse the proverbial tailwinds that have supported the equity rally since March, and especially in the last several months of 2020.

·        There is also a major contagion/problem of monetary policy as the herd of traders/investors have been incessantly chasing risk assets higher because they believe they have an insurance policy against losses, a.k.a. the manipulative interventionist FED.

Sit back, take sip of a favorite brew and contemplate for a few minutes “If the markets are rising as the incessant hype has been stated because of expectations of improving economic conditions and earnings, then why are Central Bankers pumping liquidity into the markets like crazy” Central Banker massive interventions have negative consequences as while boosting asset prices may seem like a good idea in the short-term, in the long-term, it significantly harms real economic growth it also leads to the repetitive cycle of “must-have” monetary easy-money-policies...if you remember your teaching in econ-101 [if you were a student of mine] using monetary policy to drag forward future consumption leaves an enormous void that must get continually refilled of the bubble will a collapse in the future. No matter the hype and rhetoric monetary policy cannot create self-sustaining economic growth and therefore requires larger and larger amounts of free-flowing monetary policy to maintain the same activity level. The filling of the “gap” between fundamentals and reality almost always leads to consumer contraction and, ultimately, a recession (many nasty) as economic activity recedes.

This giddy liquidity fueled stock market has returned more than 166% since the 2007 peak, which is more than 4x the growth in corporate sales, and 7.9x more than even pro forma GDP. GREAT news for the 10% of the population that owns 90% of the stocks in the market, and the overall blinded bullish sentiment is now getting greater than extremes I saw in 2000, and 2007-2008.  It is not surprising to us old-traders and investors to see that retail investor confidence (often called dumb money) is near its highest levels on record. The interesting thing about this euphoric market is that newbie investors are rushing into equities in anticipation of an economic recovery. Even I must concede that while there will be a recovery, it is likely to fall far short of current investor expectations. Such is historically the case with “euphoria” now at mania levels, the only question is just how disappointed they will be (are they conditioned to buy all 10% pullbacks?) while sentiment measures are certainly worth considering, as the old axiom goes (as I learned the hard way in late 1999 into March of 2000 trying to SHORT what I saw as a mega top) “markets can remain irrational longer than most who do not practice solid money management can remain solvent.” Therefore, from a money management point of view, I always want to focus on the technical indicators as well!  When like today markets are exuberantly bullish, with investors believing there is “no risk” to investing, you see virtually every stock moving higher as we have been experiencing.

Parabolic vertical moves have one thing in common, the psychology of the masses, and fear-of-missing-out (FOMO) and eventually the incompetence of real serious risk management. where greed and fear (fear of missing out on the bullish rally or subsequent nasty selling) are primary drivers of prices. We saw TAN (solar ETF) put in some rather bearish price action this past week. TSLA has also shown signs of rolling over; but is still the most extreme bubble of them all IMHO.  XLF has also been on fire since the November into December rotation started and has got an extra boost lately from yields rising, but over past several sessions (daily and weekly) we have had some “strange" looking candles, and we saw a rather decent gap down on Friday. Of course, financials love rising yields, but the question is was it already priced in here (we have risen right up to those pre-Covid-19 levels and earnings are still lacking at the double top as the XLF is right at that huge overhead resistance levels from a year ago. Important pre-covid-19 levels here to consider. Leading up to the pre-covid-19 top we had yields move up around 40bps. We saw a similar rise in yields this time. Though this, move is much larger in percentage terms.


Gold has frustrating anyone trying to play the so-called bullish break out momentum premise strategy for months. I suggested back in early August that we should play the contrarian position (SHORT) in GLD “gold” The move higher was significant, but few spoke about gold moving higher until it started climbing above 190. Now the GLD “gold” has gone from extremely overbought sold to most oversold. Here we are once again, the GLD has been smacked down from its relative- high of 183.20 just 9-days ago to Friday’s close of 171.13, dropping into near-term oversold territory, but not extreme (yet). In December, the GLD dipped below its 200dsma at 172.73 Now we have dropped below it. Setting up for a drop back into support at $164.00-165.00 thereafter we have solid support at $154.00-$155.0

 


The dollar that has been hated by everybody appearing on CBNC smack-talking it is suddenly pushing above the 90.5 level (DXY). The longer-term trend could be violated to the upside and as a result, an orchestrated short squeeze could be significant here. I outlined my dollar thoughts and DXY premise last week, but whenever folks have been this short the dollar it usually has bounced rather violently. Watch the close on Tuesday. A breach above the big trend line and things could get dynamic for the smart short-squeeze players.